Sunday, October 19, 2014

The Difference Between Mutual Funds and Pregame March 6th, 2014 | By WagerMinds

The Difference Between Mutual Funds and Pregame March 6th, 2014 | By WagerMinds

RJ Bell, CEO and Founder of Pregame, provided answers to our questions about Pregame’s transparency. In his answer, Bell compared Pregame’s level of disclosure to the mutual fund industry’s disclosure. In his words: I’m proud of the fact that our promotion approach is no different than the typical mutual fund. When a fund outperforms the market over X period, they promote that – without being obligated to promote the period which is less impressive. In both the case of Pregame.com and mutual funds, the raw data is available to consider for any time period the customer is interested in. Why would sports betting picks be held to a higher standard than mutual funds? Why should pick sellers be the only professionals forced to promote in a way that will turn off the average customer? This is a misstatement. Mutual fund advertisements are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In an attempt to protect consumers from misleading advertising, the SEC has laid out strict rules for how mutual funds can advertise their performance. If a fund ever references their performance, they must also disclosure their 1, 5 and 10 year performances (or shorter if the fund has not been around for that long). If a fund violates these rules, they can be sanctioned. Meanwhile, Pregame advertises performance like this: These are the three Pregame pros featured on the top left of the ‘Buy Picks’ page. As you can see, the sample sizes that are being advertised range from 5 picks to 29 picks. Now, if Pregame were disclosing at the same level of a mutual fund, they’d also have the 1, 5 and 10 year (or lifetime, if shorter) records for each of these pros. But they don’t. And if you try to find the 1, 5, and 10 year (or lifetime) record of any of these pros, the Pregame website will force you through hundreds of captchas such that it would take hundreds of man hours to determine these longer-term records. Over at Vanguard, one of the largest mutual fund companies, you can find the long term performance of any of their funds with a few clicks of your mouse. It literally took us less than 30 seconds to find. No captchas. No clicking through calendars by day. No hiding. The claim that Pregame engages in promotion “no different” than the typical mutual fund is either ignorance or deception. Or both.

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Overall: 20 - 12, +54.32 units RECORD LAST DAY OF FREE SPORTS PICKS English Premier League Soccer

Overall: 20 - 12, +54.32 units

Time Pick Units Risked Units Won
10/18/14 11:00AM [201] St. Etienne (FRA-1) +145 4 5.8
10/18/14 10:00AM [17] West Ham (ENG-P) +163 5 8.15
10/18/14 10:00AM [24] Everton (ENG-P) -1 +104 5 5.2
10/18/14 10:00AM Aston Villa (ENG-P) OVER 2.5 -120 6 5
10/18/14 10:00AM [27] Newcastle (ENG-P) +121 4.13 5
10/18/14 10:00AM Sunderland (ENG-P) UNDER 2.5 -114 5.7 -5.7
10/18/14 10:00AM [29] Sunderland (ENG-P) +619 2 -2
10/18/14 10:00AM DRAW +329 3 -3
10/18/14 10:00AM [714] Wigan (ENG-Cham) +100 5 -5
10/18/14 10:00AM [832] Rochdale (ENG-One) -0.5 -136 6.8 -6.8
10/18/14 10:00AM [829] Preston (ENG-One) -0.75 -116 5.8 5
10/18/14 10:00AM [820] Peterborough (ENG-One) -0.5 -128 6.4 5
10/18/14 10:00AM [813] Bristol City (ENG-One) -0.25 -114 5.7 5
10/18/14 10:00AM [813] Bristol City (ENG-One) +120 5 6
10/18/14 10:00AM [729] Birmingham (ENG-Cham) -0.5 +127 5 -5
10/18/14 10:00AM [14] Hull City (ENG-P) +1.5 -155 7.75 5
10/18/14 10:00AM DRAW +367 2 7.34
10/18/14 10:00AM West Ham (ENG-P) OVER 2.5 +106 5 5.3
10/18/14 10:00AM [20] Chelsea (ENG-P) -213 10.65 5
10/18/14 10:00AM [707] Derby (ENG-Cham) +142 5 7.1
10/18/14 7:45AM [12] Manchester City (ENG-P) -1 -139 6.95 5
10/18/14 7:45AM [12] Manchester City (ENG-P) -205 10.25 5
10/18/14 7:45AM Tottenham (ENG-P) OVER 3 -122 6.1 5
10/18/14 7:15AM [701] Nottingham Forest (ENG-Cham) +190 5 -5
10/18/14 7:15AM DRAW +236 2.12 -2.12
10/17/14 10:05PM [61] Minnesota Wild +117 5 -5
10/17/14 9:35PM Vancouver Canucks OVER 5.5 -115 5.75 -5.75
10/17/14 9:35PM [60] Edmonton Oilers +130 5 -5
10/17/14 9:00PM [312] Houston U -9.5 -105 5.25 5
10/17/14 9:00PM Temple OVER 52.5 -105 5.25 -5.25
10/17/14 7:05PM [52] Columbus Blue Jackets -180 9 5
10/17/14 2:30PM [51] PSG (FRA-1) -1.5 +101 5 5.05

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Remington Park HORSES TO WATCH FOR TONIGHT OCTOBER 16th. BETTING AND WATCHING HORSE RACING ISNT JUST ABOUT THE BET YOU'RE TRYING TO CASH.....

HORSES TO WATCH LIST

 BETTING AND WATCHING HORSE RACING ISNT JUST ABOUT THE BET YOU'RE TRYING TO CASH.....

ITS ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT THE NEXT TIME YOU BET YOU ARE ONE RACE WISER AS A HANDICAPPER. 

That's when the cashing will become more and more frequent.




REMINGTON PARK HTW
OCTOBER 16TH THURSDAY NIGHT
The horses to watch HTW list I have referred to ad nauseum, is where all of my handicapping starts. Doesn't by any means that I am betting on only my horses to watch. I could have a HTW I've been waiting for over a year to run.  However if it is not a favorable scenario for the horses first race off a layoff of over a year being inactive and is going 6fur over the dirt sitting at 5-1 on the board.  NO WAY MEANS THAT I AM BETTING THE HORSE.
1. I KNOW THAT HE PREFERS ROUTE OF GROUND 1 MILE OR MORE.
2. I KNOW THAT THIS HORSE PREFERS GRASS AND IS ON  DIRT.
3. ITS BEEN OVER 365 DAYS SINCE RACED.
.........
I CAN GO ON FOREVER BUT WHAT  EFFECT DOES REASON 1 THRU 1000 OF WHY NOT TO BET THIS HORSE AND RIGHTFULLY SO, I  MUST SAY IN THIS EXAMPLE;  HAVE ON THE HORSE BEING A HORSE TO WATCH
ENDING UP MY HORSES TO WATCH LIST:

EVERYTHING EVERY STEP THAT HORSE TAKES EVERYTHING MATTERS.

EVERY STEP THAT A HORSE TAKES GOOD OR BAD THAT YOU NOTICE AND OTHERS DON'T  NOTICE IS THAT MUCH MORE OF A SPEED ADVANTAGE YOU HAVE.

That's why if I had that horse running on dirt going 6fur.  With knowledge he likes long and turf. I want him to come out safe be ignored finish up well off the board even run. SO NO ONE NOTICES.
That or take a ton of money and run awful two times in a row burning money on dirt short. He'll switch to turf and long and I will pounce. 

I WILL ALWAYS USE EVERY SINGLE ONE THOUGH ON AT LEAST ONE TICKET NO MATTER WHAT IF I AM PLAYING PK ALL PICK 3S 4S EVEN DOUBLES.
MOST OF ALL THEY'RE GAME HORSES.
YOU MAY NOT REMEMBER WHY YOU REMEMBER A HORSE BUT I'M SURE THAT HORSE HAS SCREWED YOU.
I KEEP TRACK OF
HORSES PREFORMANCES
- ROUGH TRIP
-WANTS LONGER
-BAD START
- WIDE TRIP
TRAINERS
JOCKEYS
TRAINERS AND JOCKEY
TRAINERS AND OWNERS
SALES
WORKS
BREEDING
ON
AND
ON
AND
ON.

IF THEY'RE A
HTW- Horse To Watch
THEY'RE AT LEAST WORTH YOU TO.....
WATCH IF NOT BET

I WOULDN'T PUT IT OUT FOR YOU AS A QUICK REFERENCE TO LOOK AT YOU WILL BE SURPRISED WITH THE RESULTS EVEN JUST BY WATCHING AND TAKING NOTES WITH NO HANDICAPPING KNOWLEDGE AT ALL.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO WATCH A RACE WITH 8 HORSES 8 TIMES LIKE I DO AS I WAS TAUGHT.  BUT WATCH WITH PURPOSE. THE PURPOSE OF LEARNING AND GAINING AS MUCH KNOWLEDGE AS POSSIBLE TO MAKE MORE MONEY THAN THE TIMES BEFORE.  EACH RACE SHOULD RESULT IN YOU KNOWING THAT MUCH MORE ABOUT EVERY HORSE RACING.  

IT ISNT JUST ABOUT THE BET YOU'RE TRYING TO CASH.....
ITS ABOUT  MAKING SURE THAT THE NEXT TIME YOU BET YOU ARE ONE RACE WISER AS A HANDICAPPER.
That's when the cashing will become more and more frequent.

Monday, October 13, 2014

3 FREE PICKS = ANOTHER DAY OF FREE $ FOR YOU. FREE 3 TEAMER

3 FREE PICKS = ANOTHER DAY OF FREE $ FOR YOU. FREE 3 TEAMER OR you just bet  NFL
SAN FRANCISCO -3 OVER 44. NAILED MY HANDICAPPING WITH PREDICTION OF 31 20 SAN FRANCISCO PRETTY CLOSE

Time Pick Units Risked Units Won
10/13/14 8:30PM [277] San Francisco 49ers -3 -125 6.25 5
10/13/14 8:30PM San Francisco 49ers OVER 44 -105 5.25 5
10/13/14 7:35PM [56] Tampa Bay Lightning -138 6.9 5

Check out this cool image made with PicsArt by me at http://picsart.com

Friday, October 10, 2014

Hockey Night in Canada Cheat Sheet: Oct. 11

Hockey Night in Canada Cheat Sheet: Oct. 11
sportsnet.ca · by Jeff Simmons
Hockey Night in Canada Cheat Sheet: Oct. 11 - Sportsnet.ca
Jeff Simmons
  October 10, 2014, 1:44 PM
Jeff Simmons   October 10, 2014, 1:44 PM
Get ready for smorgasbord of hockey on Saturday. Rogers has you covered for the first Hockey Night in Canada of the 2014-15 season with seven different games featuring all seven Canadian teams.

In the Cheat Sheet each week, we’ll provide everything you need to know for Hockey Night in Canada:

More NHL on Sportsnet:
Subscribe: Rogers GameCentre Live
Rogers Hometown Hockey | Broadcast Schedule
Note: All games below are listed in Eastern time.

The 7:00 p.m. games:

Pittsburgh Penguins vs. Toronto Maple Leafs
Channel: CBC
Broadcast crew: Jim Hughson, Craig Simpson, Glenn Healy
Game notes: In 28 career games against Toronto, Sidney Crosby has 20 goals and 23 assists…Leafs goalie Jonathan Bernier has never registered a win against the Penguins.

Montreal Canadiens vs. Philadelphia Flyers
Channel: City
Broadcast crew: Dave Randorf, Garry Galley
Game notes: Montreal went 1-2 against the Flyers last season…Flyers star forward Claude Giroux didn’t register a goal in October last year.

Ottawa Senators vs. Tampa Bay Lightning
Channel: Sportsnet ONE
Broadcast crew: Bob Cole, Greg Millen. Oh, baby.

Game notes: Lightning forward Ondrej Palat tore up the Senators last season (nine points in five games)..Ex-Sens goalie Ben Bishop finished with a 3-0-1 record against Ottawa in 2013-14 with a save percentage of .910.

Calgary Flames vs. St. Louis Blues
Channel: Sportsnet 360
Broadcast crew: Rick Ball, Kelly Hrudey
Game notes:Jay Bouwmeester had two assists and averaged over 25:00 minutes per game against the Flames in 2013-14…Calgary won only 16 of 41 road games last year.

Also on Rogers: Washington Capitals vs. Boston Bruins (FX)

The 10:00 p.m. games:

Edmonton Oilers vs. Vancouver Canucks
Channel: CBC
Broadcast crew: Paul Romanuk, Mike Johnson
Game notes: Canucks goaltender Ryan Miller has only allowed 12 goals in seven career games against the Oilers…Taylor Hall didn’t score a goal but had five assists in five games against Vancouver last year.

Winnipeg Jets vs. San Jose Sharks
Channel: Sportsnet 360
Broadcast crew: Kevin Quinn, John Garrett
Game notes: Evander Kane suffered a lower-body injury Thursday. His status for Saturday is unclear…Winnipeg won two of three games against the Sharks in 2013-14.

What Keeps Bankers Up at Night By Andy Gordon on October 10, 2014

What Keeps Bankers Up at Night By Andy Gordon on October 10, 2014 Dear Early Investor, I'd hate to see banks disappear. After all, the best jokes around are about bankers and lawyers. My favorite: Bankers are people that help you with problems you would not have had without them. Okay, after what happened in 2007 to 2008, maybe this one hits too close to home. The freewheeling ways of big banks cost millions of people their jobs. And the resulting financial crisis left countless homeowners with plunging home values. I spent yesterday with some of my good friends from The Oxford Club, discussing the economy and what may be in store for us. One of the things that disturbed us the most? Banks have once again loaded up on derivative debt. Just like they did a decade ago. Some things never change. Banks are still taking their cues from the same playbook that nearly blew up the global financial system just a few years ago. Then again, some things do change. Disruption is afoot in the banking sector. And the banks have only themselves to blame. They simply didn't lend enough after the crisis to sustain customer loyalty. And now they're paying the price. Beginning with Lending Club and Prosper, startups have picked up the gauntlet and plugged the lending gap that banks fostered with their inattention to customer needs. The upshot? Startups are reinventing new ways to loan cash, transfer money abroad, settle international commercial transactions and score credit risk. For centuries, banks have monopolized these services. They probably thought it was their birthright, something that would continue without challenge or competition. Boy, were they wrong. THIS COULD BRING $1.71 A GALLON GAS TO THE U.S. This catalyst converts one of the Earth's most abundant energy sources into gasoline. It's not petroleum, solar, hydro, wind, corn, algae or anything else you are probably thinking. And soon it will fuel 10 million U.S. vehicles... For as little as $1.71 a gallon! FROM A SPONSOR Wall of Money Coming The Lending Club was founded in 2007 by Renaud Laplanche. Prosper was founded in 2006 by Chris Larsen and John Witchel. In England, Zopa, founded by Giles Andrews in 2005, was the trailblazer opening up the way for a new generation of "fintech" companies. There are now more than three dozen P2P lenders in the U.K. In the U.S., Lending Club and Prosper have captured 98% of the P2P market. More fintechs are on their way, lured by forecasts that P2P loans in the U.S. and U.K. will surge from the current annual usage of just over $8 billion to over $428 billion in the next decade. Here are three of my favorites. Will they be able to compete with the power and know-how of our big banks? I'll let you be the judge... TransferWise. Founded in London in 2010, it charges 0.5% to transfer money between countries. That's a pittance compared to the 5% banks charge. TransferWise takes a populist pose on its website: "No skyscrapers, no suits. Just like-minded people everywhere, connected by TransferWise." And since it moves other people's money around, it also highlights that it has 8,929 independent reviews. One of its co-founders, Taavet Hinrikus, helped start Skype in 2003. Sir Richard Branson and PayPal founders Max Levchin and Peter Thiel are also early investors. So far, the company has raised over $30 million in four rounds from seven investors. Dwolla. It was founded in 2008 by Shane Reiser and Michael Schonfeld. Dwolla's platform allows users to sidestep steep money transfer and bank payment fees by charging just $0.25 per transaction. You can't do much better than that unless you charge nothing. Actually, Dwolla does just that for transactions of $10 or less. Now the company wants to spread its wings. It's identifying ways to use its "light infrastructure," so Dwolla can extend beyond lending to individual consumers. Dwolla has raised over $30 million in eight rounds from well-known investors such as Union Square Ventures, Andreessen Horowitz and the CME Group in its just completed Series D round. Kabbage. It began in Atlanta in 2009. A year later, the company got its first investment. In 2011 alone, its technology and traction attracted investments of $7 million, $17 million and $12 million in rapid succession. Altogether, it has raised $465 million in 10 rounds. Kabbage has gone from running the first lending platform for small enterprises to being the leading online provider of small business loans. How did it do it? The company took a manual application process that lasted weeks and turned it into a simple, 100% online automated process that takes "as few as 7 minutes." The company isn't sitting on its laurels. It just launched a new service for personal loans. Called Karrot, it will provide an immediate answer and access to funds as soon as the next day. Don't Count the Powerful Banks Out Yet So, what do you think? Can these fintech startups compete with the banks? Perhaps the better question is, can the banks compete with these startups, which are figuring out how to do things much faster and cheaper than they can? The young fintechs have made the jump from serving consumer needs to the bigger money needs of small businesses. The next step - serving big corporations - will require an even bigger leap... Deploying capital amounting to trillions, not millions. It's still a ways off. You shouldn't expect these new companies to run over their bigger brethren. The big banks will start off as their customers. Eventually, the better fintech startups will be chosen to partner up with such global banks as Goldman Sachs and Bank of America. Others will seek a spot on our public stock exchanges. Lending Club will probably be the first fintech to IPO. It may go public by the end of the year. Its valuation? Just under $4 billion. Takeovers will be just as financially rewarding. These are early days. But investors are already lining up to take advantage of a sector ripe for disruption. Fintech startup investments are expected to hit $4 billion this year. That's double what it was in 2012. Dozens of startups will be reinventing how financial transactions are done. The payoffs for founders and early investors of those that find traction will be enormous. I'm keeping a close eye on this sector, and will let you know of other startups that look promising. Good investing, Andrew Gordon Founder, Early Investing             Recent Articles From Early Investing Cracks in the New Sharing Economy? By Andrew Gordon on October 8, 2014 I'm thinking of renting out my backyard for wedding events, my car on the weekends, my kitchen appliances (when my wife and I go out for dinner), my lawn and garden equipment during the week and my tuxedo anytime. Why not? I keep hearing that the sharing economy is a $26 billion market and growing. How This Hedgehog Became a Billionaire By Andrew Gordon on October 3, 2014 I once had a boss who hated stock experts, economists, investment advisors, talking heads and academics, all with equal disdain. What he liked were self-made millionaires. Didn't matter if they were unkempt, lousy with words or didn't know their wines. He trusted their knowledge and their insights. But only in the one thing they had figured out. Why Google Wants to Put a Chip in Your Brain By Andrew Gordon on October 1, 2014 I was going to tell you about how you won't recognize the cars of tomorrow... how they will anticipate your every need... like knowing which songs to play. Or what temperature you like. Then I wondered... Who's going to get smarter quicker, cars via sensors or us via brain implants? © 2014 Early Investing, LLC All Rights Reserved North America: 1 800 514 5876; Fax: 1 410 329 1923 International: +1 443 353 4335; Fax: +1 410 329 1923 Email: news@earlyinvestinginfo.com Privacy Policy | Click here to unsubscribe Nothing published by Early Investing, LLC should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in their own securities recommendations to readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publications prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Early Investing, LLC should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. The information found on this website may only be used pursuant to the membership or subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Early Investing, LLC, 14 West Mount Vernon Place, Baltimore MD 21201.